
I've collected four different sets of 'writing rules' here from well-known authors. A couple of them deal with things like grammar and syntax and the nitty-gritty line-by-line stuff, and the others with writing novels as a whole.
They're all very interesting (and there are things I agree with and disagree with), so you should definitely read them, then answer my questions at the bottom of this post and tell me your views on writing rules.
Kurt Vonnegut’s 8 Rules For Writing Fiction
- Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted.
- Give the reader at least one character he or she can root for.
- Every character should want something, even if it is only a glass of water.
- Every sentence must do one of two things — reveal character or advance the action.
- Start as close to the end as possible.
- Be a sadist. Now matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them — in order that the reader may see what they are made of.
- Write to please just one person. If you open a window and make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
- Give your readers as much information as possible as soon as possible. To heck with suspense. Readers should have such complete understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.
George Orwell's 6 Rules For Writers
- Never use a metaphor, simile or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
- Never use a long word where a short one will do.
- If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
- Never use the passive where you can use the active.
- Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
- Break any of these rules sooner than say anything barbarous.
William Safire's Rules for Writers
- Remember to never split an infinitive.
- The passive voice should never be used.
- Do not put statements in the negative form.
- Verbs have to agree with their subjects.
- Proofread carefully to see if you words out.
- If you reread your work, you can find on rereading a great deal of repetition can be by rereading and editing.
- A writer must not shift your point of view.
- And don't start a sentence with a conjunction. (Remember, too, a preposition is a terrible word to end a sentence with.)
- Don't overuse exclamation marks!!
- Place pronouns as close as possible, especially in long sentences, as of 10 or more words, to their antecedents.
- Writing carefully, dangling participles must be avoided.
- If any word is improper at the end of a sentence, a linking verb is.
- Take the bull by the hand and avoid mixing metaphors.
- Avoid trendy locutions that sound flaky.
- Everyone should be careful to use a singular pronoun with singular nouns in their writing.
- Always pick on the correct idiom.
- The adverb always follows the verb.
- Last but not least, avoid cliches like the plague; seek viable alternatives.
Easy on the Adverbs, Exclamation Points and Especially Hooptedoodle
from the New York Times, Writers on Writing Series.
By ELMORE LEONARD
from the New York Times, Writers on Writing Series.
By ELMORE LEONARD
These are rules I’ve picked up along the way to help me remain invisible when I’m writing a book, to help me show rather than tell what’s taking place in the story. If you have a facility for language and imagery and the sound of your voice pleases you, invisibility is not what you are after, and you can skip the rules. Still, you might look them over.
1. Never open a book with weather. If it’s only to create atmosphere, and not a character’s reaction to the weather, you don’t want to go on too long. The reader is apt to leaf ahead looking for people. There are exceptions. If you happen to be Barry Lopez, who has more ways to describe ice and snow than an Eskimo, you can do all the weather reporting you want.
2. Avoid prologues.
They can be annoying, especially a prologue following an introduction that comes after a foreword. But these are ordinarily found in nonfiction. A prologue in a novel is backstory, and you can drop it in anywhere you want.
There is a prologue in John Steinbeck’s “Sweet Thursday,” but it’s O.K. because a character in the book makes the point of what my rules are all about. He says: “I like a lot of talk in a book and I don’t like to have nobody tell me what the guy that’s talking looks like. I want to figure out what he looks like from the way he talks. . . . figure out what the guy’s thinking from what he says. I like some description but not too much of that. . . . Sometimes I want a book to break loose with a bunch of hooptedoodle. . . . Spin up some pretty words maybe or sing a little song with language. That’s nice. But I wish it was set aside so I don’t have to read it. I don’t want hooptedoodle to get mixed up with the story.”
They can be annoying, especially a prologue following an introduction that comes after a foreword. But these are ordinarily found in nonfiction. A prologue in a novel is backstory, and you can drop it in anywhere you want.
There is a prologue in John Steinbeck’s “Sweet Thursday,” but it’s O.K. because a character in the book makes the point of what my rules are all about. He says: “I like a lot of talk in a book and I don’t like to have nobody tell me what the guy that’s talking looks like. I want to figure out what he looks like from the way he talks. . . . figure out what the guy’s thinking from what he says. I like some description but not too much of that. . . . Sometimes I want a book to break loose with a bunch of hooptedoodle. . . . Spin up some pretty words maybe or sing a little song with language. That’s nice. But I wish it was set aside so I don’t have to read it. I don’t want hooptedoodle to get mixed up with the story.”
3. Never use a verb other than “said” to carry dialogue.
The line of dialogue belongs to the character; the verb is the writer sticking his nose in. But said is far less intrusive than grumbled, gasped, cautioned, lied. I once noticed Mary McCarthy ending a line of dialogue with “she asseverated,” and had to stop reading to get the dictionary.
The line of dialogue belongs to the character; the verb is the writer sticking his nose in. But said is far less intrusive than grumbled, gasped, cautioned, lied. I once noticed Mary McCarthy ending a line of dialogue with “she asseverated,” and had to stop reading to get the dictionary.
4. Never use an adverb to modify the verb “said” . . .
. . . he admonished gravely. To use an adverb this way (or almost any way) is a mortal sin. The writer is now exposing himself in earnest, using a word that distracts and can interrupt the rhythm of the exchange. I have a character in one of my books tell how she used to write historical romances “full of rape and adverbs.”
. . . he admonished gravely. To use an adverb this way (or almost any way) is a mortal sin. The writer is now exposing himself in earnest, using a word that distracts and can interrupt the rhythm of the exchange. I have a character in one of my books tell how she used to write historical romances “full of rape and adverbs.”
5. Keep your exclamation points under control.
You are allowed no more than two or three per 100,000 words of prose. If you have the knack of playing with exclaimers the way Tom Wolfe does, you can throw them in by the handful.
You are allowed no more than two or three per 100,000 words of prose. If you have the knack of playing with exclaimers the way Tom Wolfe does, you can throw them in by the handful.
6. Never use the words “suddenly” or “all hell broke loose.”
This rule doesn’t require an explanation. I have noticed that writers who use “suddenly” tend to exercise less control in the application of exclamation points.
This rule doesn’t require an explanation. I have noticed that writers who use “suddenly” tend to exercise less control in the application of exclamation points.
7. Use regional dialect, patois, sparingly.
Once you start spelling words in dialogue phonetically and loading the page with apostrophes, you won’t be able to stop. Notice the way Annie Proulx captures the flavor of Wyoming voices in her book of short stories “Close Range.”
Once you start spelling words in dialogue phonetically and loading the page with apostrophes, you won’t be able to stop. Notice the way Annie Proulx captures the flavor of Wyoming voices in her book of short stories “Close Range.”
8. Avoid detailed descriptions of characters.
Which Steinbeck covered. In Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” what do the “American and the girl with him” look like? “She had taken off her hat and put it on the table.” That’s the only reference to a physical description in the story, and yet we see the couple and know them by their tones of voice, with not one adverb in sight.
Which Steinbeck covered. In Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” what do the “American and the girl with him” look like? “She had taken off her hat and put it on the table.” That’s the only reference to a physical description in the story, and yet we see the couple and know them by their tones of voice, with not one adverb in sight.
9. Don’t go into great detail describing places and things.
Unless you’re Margaret Atwood and can paint scenes with language or write landscapes in the style of Jim Harrison. But even if you’re good at it, you don’t want descriptions that bring the action, the flow of the story, to a standstill.
Unless you’re Margaret Atwood and can paint scenes with language or write landscapes in the style of Jim Harrison. But even if you’re good at it, you don’t want descriptions that bring the action, the flow of the story, to a standstill.
And finally:
10. Try to leave out the part that readers tend to skip.
A rule that came to mind in 1983. Think of what you skip reading a novel: thick paragraphs of prose you can see have too many words in them. What the writer is doing, he’s writing, perpetrating hooptedoodle, perhaps taking another shot at the weather, or has gone into the character’s head, and the reader either knows what the guy’s thinking or doesn’t care. I’ll bet you don’t skip dialogue.
10. Try to leave out the part that readers tend to skip.
A rule that came to mind in 1983. Think of what you skip reading a novel: thick paragraphs of prose you can see have too many words in them. What the writer is doing, he’s writing, perpetrating hooptedoodle, perhaps taking another shot at the weather, or has gone into the character’s head, and the reader either knows what the guy’s thinking or doesn’t care. I’ll bet you don’t skip dialogue.
My most important rule is one that sums up the 10.
If it sounds like writing, I rewrite it.
Or, if proper usage gets in the way, it may have to go. I can’t allow what we learned in English composition to disrupt the sound and rhythm of the narrative. It’s my attempt to remain invisible, not distract the reader from the story with obvious writing. (Joseph Conrad said something about words getting in the way of what you want to say.)
If I write in scenes and always from the point of view of a particular character—the one whose view best brings the scene to life—I’m able to concentrate on the voices of the characters telling you who they are and how they feel about what they see and what’s going on, and I’m nowhere in sight.
What Steinbeck did in “Sweet Thursday” was title his chapters as an indication, though obscure, of what they cover. “Whom the Gods Love They Drive Nuts” is one, “Lousy Wednesday” another. The third chapter is titled “Hooptedoodle 1” and the 38th chapter “Hooptedoodle 2” as warnings to the reader, as if Steinbeck is saying: “Here’s where you’ll see me taking flights of fancy with my writing, and it won’t get in the way of the story. Skip them if you want.”
“Sweet Thursday” came out in 1954, when I was just beginning to be published, and I’ve never forgotten that prologue.
Did I read the hooptedoodle chapters? Every word.
- What's your opinion on writing rules? A help or a hindrance?
- Do they naturally occur to writers, or should they be taught?
- Have any of your own personal writing rules to add?
I find writing rules a bit unnecessary and overcomplicated - personally, the only rules I think every writer need apply to are these:
1. Read.
2. Write.
But, you know, I like to simplify things.
18 notes passed:
Great post, Steph. Nice to see all those bits and pieces in the one place! I personally like to read writing rules but I don't look at them at all during the process. Maybe when I'm editing I'll scan back over them and see if anything jumps out at me. I do like hearing from people who've been in this business a long time, though. I figure if I can learn from their mistakes then I'm saving myself time!! However, I agree with you - the best rules are to read and write as often as humanly possible.
Great post, Steph.
It's always great to learn by others. I think you nail it though - the two most important rules are READ and WRITE. Say no more!
Sweet and great post, I agree with you, since I can't relate at all to all of these rules.
William Safire's rules made me smile!
that william safire is HILARIOUS! those two last lots of writing advice are so brilliant. i think you're missing the point if you're just taking them as advice, they are marvellous bits of writing on their own. and as such, act as inspiration and impetus to writewritewrite. thanks for bringing them to my attention! now back to hooptedoodleing.
p.s. i also love jack kerouac's belief and technique for modern prose, including my favourites: 'try never get drunk outside yr own house' and 'you're a genuis all the time' magnifique.
Great post! I just discovered William Safire's rules when he died last year.
I agree with all of Kurt Vonnegut's rules except #8, about the reader being able to "...finish the story themselves." I think an ending should be a surprise to the reader, but, on a second look, be the only conclusion possible for the story. I don't think the reader could reach this apart from the writer.
Rules bring out the rebel in me. If someone tells me not to use the word "suddenly" then I find myself making a point of using it (often quite suddenly). I'm going to have trouble defying that lot, though! ;)
Fascinating post - thank you!
Very interesting...thanks for posting this.
I think a set of rules like this is a great thing to keep in mind when reading through first and second drafts. It's interesting to see what other authors choose to do.
Also, now I know what Elmore Leonard's books suck so much.
Oh, I'm so including this in my "Best Posts of January" list! Thanks!
Gold gold gold! Vonnegut is on the money--as long as the denouement comes before the last few pages, I guess. Orwell is the master of the complex story using simple language. I love his stuff. And HA, Safire! Too funny. (But I'm breaking out in cold sweat that I can't see the error in "Verbs have to agree with their subjects". Argh. Someone enlighten me, please.)
When I read writing rules, sometimes they remind me that what I'm doing or want (writing) can be considered a job. That it needs to have specific rules and whatnot. It puts a weight on something that I just don't see in that way. The rules of 'not starting with a prologue' or 'not having excessive descriptions' makes it feel like I'm writing for school instead of something I enjoy. It's nice to know, but I put some of them on the back burner until I get to editing. I'm not really making any sense...
When it comes to the grammar and syntax that part of writing mentioned in the tips that does need to be taught. The proper way to describe things to fit your story, etc. is something that naturally occurs for writers who just keep writing.
I really have nothing to add. My favorite rule of all would have to be the one in the picture. Just 'Shut Up and Write.'
I'm printing this and hanging it on my wall, right now.
You're brilliant!
"If you open a window and make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia."
Or herpes.
I like so-called writing rules. They're amusing and if taken with the right sized grain of salt, they can all provide excellent advice.
I don't agree with everything said (especially the overuse of the word "never". Ugh.), but I loved reading through all of this!
My favorite writer rules were William Safire's. They were hilarious. I might just have to print them out and stick 'em on my wall.
Most of all, though, I agree with your rules... because they're exactly the same as mine.
In Janet Evanovich's HOW I WRITE, she said something like "I think of what it SEEMS like the characters are about to do, and then I have them do something completely different."
I'm not quoting exactly, but this snippet of advice has stayed with me ever since I read Evanovich's book. I think about it an awful lot as I write.
Fine post! I laughed over Safire. The rules might be better stated as guidelines that can be broken for good reasons. For example, dialogue or first person narration should break some rules of grammar or risks sounding stilted.
Leonard's rules were way too prescriptive unless you aspire to writing like Hemingway. Some prologues work well. Weather can be good to set the mood, especially if the weather is almost a character in itself. I like details about character and setting, although not overdone. You see more detail in literary fiction and less in YA. One should be careful of confusing style with rules.
Grammar should be taught. I'm not so sure creative writing can be taught, only nurtured. At least writing classes provide income for authors. I've learned most of what I know about writing through reading.
I agree with your 2 rules but would add a third: revise and get feedback.
I forgot to ask, what was the source for Safire's rules? I appreciated that you cited the rest.
Post a Comment